Logo

MonoCalc

/

LC Resonant Frequency Calculator

Physics

The tank circuit

Every panel below reads this one L–C pair, so the resonant frequency, the selectivity figures, the reactance chart and the tolerance window always describe the same circuit.

A series tank is a short circuit at resonance: X_L and X_C cancel and only the loss resistance R is left, so the current peaks and the voltage across each reactance rises to Q times the drive. Lower R means a sharper, taller peak.

1.0730 MHz

Computed from the other two.
Series ESR, or the parallel tank resistance.
Alternative to R — the ESR is back-solved from it.
Board and probe capacitance, added in parallel with C.
Off-resonance reactance check.
0 to 10.
0.25 to 4 either side of f₀.

f₀ = 1 / (2π · √(L · C))

Q = (1/R) · √(L / C) = ω₀L / R

Resonant frequency (f₀)

1.0730 MHz

Series LCMF (medium frequency)AM broadcast band
Resonant frequency f₀
1.0730 MHz
Angular frequency ω₀
6.7420 Mrad/s
Period T
931.9470 ns
Characteristic impedance Z₀
674.1999 Ω
Inductance L
100.0000 µH
Capacitor C
220.0000 pF
Stray C
0.0000 F
Effective C_eff
220.0000 pF
ELFLFMFHFVHFUHF1 kHz3 GHz

300 kHz–3 MHz. The AM broadcast band and the classic 455 kHz IF strip live here.

Step-by-step derivation

Effective capacitance

C_eff = C + C_stray = 220.0000 pF + 0.0000 F = 220.0000 pF

Thomson's formula

f₀ = 1 / (2π · √(L · C_eff)) = 1 / (2π · √(1.00000e-4 · 2.20000e-10))

Resonant frequency

f₀ = 1.0730 MHz

Angular frequency

ω₀ = 2π·f₀ = 1/√(L·C_eff) = 6.74200e+6 rad/s

Period

T = 1/f₀ = 931.9470 ns

Characteristic impedance

Z₀ = √(L/C_eff) = 674.1999 Ω

Quality factor (series)

Q = (1/R) · √(L / C) = ω₀L / R → Q = 269.6799

Bandwidth

BW = f₀/Q = 1.0730 MHz / 269.6799 = 3.9789 kHz

Damping ratio

ζ = 1/(2Q) = 0.0018540 → underdamped

About This Tool

LC Resonant Frequency – Thomson's Formula, Q and Bandwidth

Put an inductor and a capacitor together and you have built an electrical pendulum. Energy sloshes from the capacitor's electric field into the coil's magnetic field and back again, and it does so at one particular rate set by Thomson's formula f₀ = 1 / (2π · √(L · C)). This LC resonant frequency calculator evaluates that expression with L in henries and Cin farads, then rearranges it for whichever quantity you leave blank — so it also answers “what capacitor do I need for 13.56 MHz?” and “what coil pairs with this 470 pF part?”

Why the reactances cancel

Resonance is not a mysterious property of the pair; it is simply the one frequency where the two reactances are equal in magnitude. Inductive reactance X_L = 2πfL rises with frequency while capacitive reactance X_C = 1/(2πfC) falls, so they must cross exactly once. Setting 2πfL = 1/(2πfC) and solving for fgives Thomson's formula directly. Because they are opposite in sign, at that crossing they cancel and the circuit looks purely resistive — which is why the tool also reports the characteristic impedance Z₀ = √(L/C), the common magnitude each reactance holds at resonance.

A 100 µH coil with 220 pF resonates at 1.0730 MHz, with ω₀ = 6.742 × 10⁶ rad/s, a period of 932 ns and Z₀ = 674.2 Ω. Halving either component multiplies the frequency by √2, never by two — the square root is the single most common source of mental arithmetic errors in tank design.

Q, bandwidth and damping

The frequency tells you where the peak sits; the quality factortells you how sharp it is. Add the coil's equivalent series resistance and a series tank gives Q = (1/R)·√(L/C); supply a parallel load and the relationship inverts to Q = R·√(C/L). From Q follow the −3 dB bandwidth BW = f₀/Q, the half-power edges f₀·(√(1 + 1/(4Q²)) ∓ 1/(2Q)), and the damping ratio ζ = 1/(2Q) that classifies the response as underdamped, critically damped or overdamped.

For that same tank with R = 2.5 Ω, Q works out at 269.68, giving a bandwidth of just 3.9789 kHz between 1.0710 and 1.0750 MHz and a damping ratio of 0.0018540. Q is also a magnification factor: drive that series tank with 1 V and roughly 270 V appears across the inductor and across the capacitor. Component voltage ratings, not the supply rail, are what fail first in a high-Q resonator.

Tuning, stray capacitance and tolerance

Swap the fixed capacitor for a variable one and the covered band follows f ∝ 1/√C, so the tuning ratio is exactly √(C_max/C_min) and the coil cancels out. A 10–365 pF broadcast gang therefore gives 6.04 : 1 whatever it is wired to — with a 240 µH loopstick that spans 3.2487 MHz down to 0.5377 MHz.

Stray capacitance is not optional

Board traces, coil self-capacitance and a scope probe each add a few picofarads across the tank. Folding 5 pF of stray into a 220 pF tank pulls 1.0730 MHz down to 1.0610 MHz — a 1.1 % shift from 2.3 % more capacitance, because frequency follows the inverse square root.

Tolerance compounds the same way. With ±5 % parts and that 5 pF of stray, the worst-case window runs from 1.0105 to 1.1169 MHz — over ten percent wide, which is why RF tanks are built with a trimmer rather than a calculated part alone. The tool names the tolerance model it used beside the window, since applying the spread to the effective capacitance and applying it to the ordered part alone give visibly different answers.

Where lumped modelling stops

Every result here assumes an ideal lumped inductor and capacitor. Real coils have self-resonance, real capacitors have lead inductance, and above roughly a gigahertz the board itself becomes part of the circuit. Treat the calculated resonant frequency as the starting point a trimmer moves from, and the reported band label — LF, MF, HF, the 455 kHz IF, the AM broadcast band, NFC at 13.56 MHz — as the sanity check that you are designing in the right decade.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is the LC Resonant Frequency Calculator free?

Yes, LC Resonant Frequency Calculator is totally free :)

Can I use the LC Resonant Frequency Calculator offline?

Yes, you can install the webapp as PWA.

Is it safe to use LC Resonant Frequency Calculator?

Yes, any data related to LC Resonant Frequency Calculator only stored in your browser (if storage required). You can simply clear browser cache to clear all the stored data. We do not store any data on server.

How does this LC resonant frequency calculator work?

Enter any two of frequency, inductance and capacitance in whatever units the parts are marked in — H through nH and F through pF can be mixed freely — and the calculator normalises both to henries and farads before evaluating Thomson's formula f₀ = 1/(2π√(LC)) or one of its two rearrangements. That single unrounded frequency then drives everything else: ω₀, the period, the characteristic impedance, the quality factor and bandwidth, the tolerance window and the response curve. Because f₀ depends on the square root of a product spanning twenty orders of magnitude, nothing is ever rebuilt from a rounded intermediate.

Does the series or parallel choice change the resonant frequency?

No — f₀ = 1/(2π√(LC)) is identical for both, because resonance is simply the frequency at which X_L and X_C are equal in magnitude, and that condition does not care how the two parts are wired. What the topology changes is everything around the peak: a series tank is a minimum-impedance short at resonance with Q = (1/R)√(L/C), while a parallel tank is a maximum-impedance open with Q = R√(C/L). The same resistance therefore makes a series tank sharp and a parallel tank blunt, which is why the tool asks for the topology before reporting Q, bandwidth or damping.

Why does my real circuit resonate lower than the calculated frequency?

Almost always because of capacitance you did not enter. Board traces, the coil's own inter-winding capacitance and an oscilloscope probe each add a few picofarads in parallel with the tank, and the calculator's stray-capacitance field exists to fold them in. The shift is not linear: adding 5 pF of stray to a 220 pF tank is only 2.2 % more capacitance but pulls f₀ down by about 1.1 %, because frequency follows the inverse square root. At VHF and above the coil's self-resonance and the capacitor's lead inductance start to matter too, and no lumped formula predicts those.

What tolerance model does the worst-case window use?

The stray capacitance is folded in first, so C_eff = C + C_stray, and the corners are then evaluated at L_min·C_eff_min for the upper frequency and L_max·C_eff_max for the lower one — f₀ falls monotonically in both L and C, so those really are the extremes and no search of the interior is needed. Because some designers treat board stray as a fixed, known figure rather than a graded part, a second model is offered that applies the tolerance to the ordered capacitor alone and adds the stray afterwards; it produces a slightly narrower window. The model in force is always named next to the result so the numbers are unambiguous.

How wide a band can one variable capacitor cover?

Since f₀ ∝ 1/√C, the tuning ratio is exactly √(C_max/C_min) and the coil value cancels out entirely — a 10–365 pF broadcast gang gives √36.5 ≈ 6.04 : 1 no matter which loopstick you pair it with. That is enough to cover the medium-wave band several times over, which is why real receivers pad the low-capacitance end down. Stray capacitance always shrinks the achieved ratio, because it is a larger fraction of the small end of the swing than of the large end.

How accurate is this for a real tank circuit?

The arithmetic is exact for the values you type, but the parts are not. Class-2 ceramic capacitors drift by tens of percent with temperature, voltage and age, ferrite-cored coils shift with temperature and drive level, and a coil's Q collapses at the frequency where its own self-capacitance takes over. Expect the built circuit to land within the tolerance window the tool reports, not on the nominal figure, and treat any calculated Q above about 1000 as a sign that the ESR entered is optimistic rather than as a real prediction.